Posted by: thescoundrel | December 2, 2009

Obama Afghanistan Strategy Speech


The big decision is in and after about three months of playing kick the can with his military direction concerning the War in Afghanistan, President Obama has made his decision to send in more troops. The decision was not a well-kept secret. The major unknown question seemed just how many troops Obama would send in. The Obama decision was to send in less troops than was requested by his military leadership. There was an interesting story concerning the Obama speech content by journalists – Woodward and Burns. They felt that the Obama speech skimmed over many of the realities that must be faced in Afghanistan. There was also a compelling story on the Quad City Times, which got buried by other stories, where some of the Quad City community -with military family- discussed their displeasure, as they felt cheated with a less than full committal direction by Obama. My personal opinion of the decision is as mixed as the myriad of differing analysis’ of the Obama decision I have read since the speech was finished.

Not long after a Democrat Debate during the 2008 election I got into a discussion with family over the various candidates unzipping their pants to whip out their stiffened phallic rhetoric concerning how they would or would not address the current Wars we are engaged in. During my family discussion I stated that campaign talk was empty words, and that the War and internal politics would mostly dictate whatever direction any eventual POTUS would take. My feelings then, were the same as they are now. How Obama manages this war will be determined by who, what, where, when and how the hostile military combatants clash. Those will be determined by the dueling military strategists and fought with the resources made available by opposing political providers. He can speechify about war all he wants, but what a POTUS may want to do is confined by all those restrictive variables.

Between Obama’s speech and inactions I am worried that he is insecure with the military-versus-political paths he has in front of him. Obama has selected veteran military leaders as his battle advisors. Yet instead of directing his battlefront using his military strategists, Obama seems to be allowing pacifist-pleasing political pressure to manipulate and override his established military advisors battlefield strategy. I get the feeling from this decision on troop amounts– a decision similar to the direction that has been predicted in the news for months- that he is waffling between personal/party political convenience and what his military advisors have suggested. That concern makes me worry similar to the locals in the Quad City Times article, that were apprehensive about the stated Obama Afghanistan solution. It makes me worry that Obama is not attempting to win, but instead, that Obama is just putting on a Big Top Extravaganza in Afghanistan, as he looks for a reason to quit in a manner that will also save his political face/fate.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. The west point cadets didn’t appear too thrilled being in the audience. I couldn’t stop chuckling every time that one kid would nod off as the camera panned the room.

    Several times Obama paused like he expected applause, but he didn’t get it.

    This stagged event reminds me of the time Obama invited all the Dr’s to the White House for a photo op on health care. One of the Fox reporters said that Obama staffers even suppled white medical coats to some people that didn’t have them.

  2. I missed the speech but it doesn’t sound like I missed much. All his speeches show me is that he can talk the talk.

  3. “. . . various candidates unzipping their pants to whip out their stiffened phallic rhetoric. . .”? 😀

    I agree Obama isn’t enthusiastic about winning, but my hope is that our magnificent military will overcome the bad vibes emanating from their C in C and get the job done inspite of Obama.

  4. I wanted to believe the guy was shooting straight last night. But the more he talked the more his speech came across as a campaign speech. And the Woodward and Burns article I linked to, really brought out some serious problems he just glossed over. I am all for this idea as long as he is truly attempting to fix the problems in Afghanistan. But the fact that he took months to decide on the same solution that was projected from the time of the Generals troop request plus factor that in with all his other mishmash I am just not positive he is in it for anything other than a CYA moment.

    “. . . various candidates unzipping their pants to whip out their stiffened phallic rhetoric. . .”?

    Well that was exactly what the debates became when the talk of war was the subject. And after everybody exposed themselves – Hillary had the biggest package of all the Democrat candidates.

  5. Well sure, Obama’s speech was an absurd charade, but we have to go to war with the commander in chief we have, not the commander in chief we wish we had.

    If this thing can be done, our military can and will do it.

    “Hillary had the biggest package of all the Democrat candidates”—you’re really on a roll today! 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: