Posted by: thescoundrel | March 21, 2011

Warlord Obama


According to a Politico article there are a group of Democrats challenging Prez Barack Obama’s decision, as well as the Constitutionality of the decision, to use military force against Libya. Okay. Anyone that reads much of my blog realizes that I think as a President, that Barack Obama is a Marxist wannabe and a PUTZ! So regular readers of my blog might be shocked that I actually agree with Obama’s decision to honor our NATO allies lead and bomb the Libyan military. (On a related tangent,  I do not give a flying horse turd about whatever the -useless as teats on a boar- United Nations votes on the affair.)

Basically Obama is in a similar “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation that his predecessors from George W. Bush all the way back to Jimmy Carter faced when dealing with policy in the Middle East. The best any POTUS can do is find a way to sell his actions because there will be tons of human excrement  dumped on the decision maker – whatever the individual decides.

However, as I inferred in my last post, that does not make 2011  POTUS Barack Obama any less of an enormous hypocrite when compared to the words of 2008 candidate Obama. Candidate Obama bashed Bush on his military actions as a path to become the current POTUS. Over on the Drudge Report they listed the 2011 Obama pre-military engagement of Libya oration versus the 2003 Bush Iraq oration:

MARCH 19, 2011
OBAMA: ‘Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the United States and the world’…

MARCH 19, 2003
BUSH: ‘American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger’…

Wow – sounds like they hired the same speechwriter! No doubt about it – the longer Obama is in office the more his military dialogue resembles his predecessor – George W. Bush. I guess the Bush Deranged and lamestream media- whom pushed Obama into office- now have a Marxist-wannabe version of George W. Bush Jr. on their hands.


Responses

  1. No; not warlord, junkyard dog owned by the UN.

    France and Britain wanted this engagement – and for America to bear the upfront costs of it – and Obama went along with the ruling of the UNSC on it, rather than vetoing it.

    Maybe he thought it wouldn’t pass, which it nearly didn’t.

  2. Like everything about Obama – he is a wannabe – whether it be Warlord or Junkyard Dog. I am unhappy about the cost myself. The way I see it is if we are going to be expected to be the UN’s hired mercenaries they should have to foot the cost and reimburse the US.

  3. Both sides of the isle now realize Mr. Obama’s lack of leadership is causing grave harm to our once great Country. I’d prefer his liberal hack advisors take control and run their individual departments rather than one empty suit role playing. Even scary lefties are better than nothing.

  4. I am not sold that both sides of the isle are sold on Obama’s lack of leadership. The way I see the issue is that all political parties including the Republican and Democrat parties consist of various factions that have banded together under a single banner. So in this case many of the Republicans are going to push against Obama – not because they agree or disagree with Obama – but because he is still the man to beat in the next election. The problem the Democrat Party faces is that military POTUS Obama is not the same person as 2008 Military Campaign Rhetoric Obama. A large part of those factions that pushed Obama into the White House were people who are drastically anti-military. These are the people in the Democrat Party whom are now screaming foul. The Obama worshiping sections of media are mostly ignoring the differences in 2008 Obama versus 2011 Obama. He is still their Socialist Hero. The thing about Socialists and Communists is that they may preach peace and tolerance but they rule with an iron fist.

  5. What upsets me most about this Libya thing is that TID, DB, Socialist Hippie, etc. aren’t around so we can rub their faces in this.

    What a hoot that would be!

  6. QCE, for any reason, rubbing or not, why would you want those paint-chip eaters back? We won; they’re gone! It works; we work. Step #1, accomplished! Please wish for rain or urine-run cars or the Irish Bunny; ANYTHING but those gutter rats. Thank you!

  7. PS: Scoundrel, are you getting my email? G

  8. […] Warlord Obama (thescoundrel.wordpress.com) […]

  9. G, you ask why—um, I think it’s called schadenfreude.🙂

  10. OK, but you have only 2 wishes left …

  11. Commander in Chief? My foot, Who is in charge in America?

  12. great blog by the way…..

  13. […] According to a Politico article there are a group of Democrats challenging Prez Barack Obama’s decision, as well as the Constitutionality of the decision, to use military force against Libya. Okay. Anyone that reads much of my blog realizes that I think as a President, that Barack Obama is a Marxist wannabe and a PUTZ! So regular readers of my blog might be shocked that I actually agree with Obama’s decision to honor our NATO allies lead and bomb … Read More […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: